Manoj Kumar files case against Shahrukh, Farah for defamation

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Apr 02 2013 | 6:10 PM IST
Yesteryears actor Manoj Kumar today filed a criminal case against Shahrukh Khan and choreographer-turned-director Farah Khan in a local court for allegedly defaming him in their film 'Om Shanti Om'.
Kumar sought registration of FIR against the duo for alleged offences such as criminal breach of trust, cheating, defamation and conspiracy.
The case dates back to 2007 when 'Om Shanti Om' was released with a scene in which Khan had allegedly "mimicked" Kumar. It was allegedly shown in the movie that Kumar was prevented from entering an auditorium during a show.
However, Kumar had in 2008 objected to the scene and filed a defamation suit but he withdrew the case after Khan had apologised to him personally and assured that the scene in which he was mimicking Kumar would be deleted.
The city civil court had also in 2008 directed Khan to delete the scene allegedly ridiculing Kumar before the movie was slated for telecast on TV channels.
Kumar, in the complaint filed today in a court of Andheri Metropolitan Magistrate through his lawyer Ashok Sarogi, said the movie was released recently in Japan after which he started getting telephone calls saying it still contained the controversial scene depicting him in allegedly poor light.
"The complainant (Kumar) had been made to believe that the scene was deleted from the film. However, it was not deleted and accused (Khan and Farah) have made an attempt to gain cheap popularity and business for the film and made money out of it," alleged Kumar in the complaint.
Further, according to Kumar, the accused had hatched a conspiracy to show the same objectionable scene all over the places and thereby make illegal profits by keeping Kumar in the dark. In this way, they had committed a fraud on him, Kumar alleged.
Kumar has sought a thorough police investigation saying since the original negatives and electronic master prints continue to be with the accused, the case needs a proper probe.
Adjourning the case till weekend, the magistrate today directed that a copy of the film, containing the allegedly objectionable scene, be produced in the court.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 02 2013 | 6:10 PM IST

Next Story