Addressing the Consultative Committee attached to his ministry here, Parrikar said that the current DPP is under amendment and is under the consideration of his ministry after a committee of experts headed by Dhirendra Singh had submitted its report.
The Committee was appointed to evolve a policy framework to facilitate 'Make in India' in defence manufacturing, align the policy evolved with DPP-2013 and suggest requisite amendments in DPP-2013 to remove bottlenecks in the procurement process and also simplify and rationalise various aspects of defence procurement.
Along with this, the Defence Procurement Manual is under the process of internal vetting and is expected to be finalised by June end of 2016, a statement by the ministry said.
Top defence sources have said that the new DPP is likely to be out this month itself.
The DPP has evolved to DPP-2013 through an iterative process since the first DPP in 2002 (2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2011 and 2013).
It encapsulates the experience gained in implementing the procurement process over the years, feedback from the stakeholders - user services, quality control and maintenance agencies, defence finance, administrative wing and industry.
Amendments are carried out continuously keeping in view the requirements of all stakeholders.
In DPP-2013, the acquisition of weapon systems and equipment for the Armed Forces flows from the Long Term Integrated Perspective Plan (LTIPP). The current LTIPP spells out the capability desired to be achieved by the Armed Forces over 15 years duration (2012-27).
The Categorisation Committees while considering categorisation of all capital acquisition under the Defence Procurement Procedure, follow a preferred order of categorisation, in decreasing order of preference - Buy(Indian), Buy & Make (Indian), Make, Buy & Make, Buy (Global).
This hierarchy of categorisation clearly marks a shift towards indigenous equipment.
Taking part in the discussion, Members of Parliament suggested that the government should give incentives under the Buy (Indian) and Buy & Make (Indian) categories.
They also said that PSUs should also be allowed to bid for Buy (Indian) category and that offsets should be in terms of overall requirements of users.
The MPs who attended the meeting included Pinaki Mishra, Saugata Roy, A Seetaram Naik, Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Mahendra Prasad, T K Rangarajan, Bhupender Yadav, and Samsher Singh Manhas.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)