"The company had acted in an untrustworthy manner...They had the capacity to produce a safe product but had not done so," Mahmood Pracha, Counsel for FSSAI's CEO, argued before a bench of Justices V M Kanade and B P Colabawalla.
The court was hearing a petition filed by Nestle India against FSSAI's June 5 order banning nine variants of Maggi and Maharashtra government's order prohibiting their sale.
The lawyer clarified that Indian government had not banned Maggi but asked the company to stop production and sale of the product as it contained lead above permissible levels. After FSSAI issued a notice to Nestle, the company could have given a reply within a day but it chose not to do so, he said.
The notice had been issued to the company, keeping in mind the health hazards Maggie could have caused to the people due to alleged high lead presence in the product, he said.
The hearing was adjourned until then by the bench.
Nestle has argued that a certain batch of Maggi may have contained lead beyond permissible limit but the decision to impose a blanket ban was "unfair and illegal."
The company has claimed that it had tested the product in 2,700 laboratories in India and also abroad and the tests indicated that the lead content was less than the permissible limit of 0.5 per cent.
