No need to impound passport of Minister: RPO informs HC

Image
Press Trust of India Chennai
Last Updated : Sep 01 2014 | 11:20 PM IST
The Regional Passport Officer in Chennai today informed the Madrs High court that there was no need to impound the passport issued to Tamil Nadu Fisheries Minister Jayabal Arumugam under the Indian Passports Act, 1967.
One Kaliamoorthy had alleged that the Minister had obtained passport under Tatkal scheme suppressing the facts regarding a criminal case pending against him in the Judicial Magistrate court in Nagapattinam district, which is against the provisions of Indian Passport Act.
The Regional Passport Officer (RPO) submitted that the Nagapattinam police had registered a case against 26 persons, including Jayabal, under Tamil Nadu Public Properties Act on November 1, 2006, on a complaint from one Sakthivel.
A final report by police in the case was submitted to the the Judicial Magistrate on March 14, 2014.
Meanwhile, following a petition by the Minister and others, the High Court had quashed further proceedings in the case, following which the Magistrate had discharged all the accused in the case on June 27 this year.
The Pasport Officer submitted that as per the report of the Superintendent of Police, Nagapattinam, on the date of application of the passport, there was no cognizance taken in any case by any court in Nagapattinam against Jayabal.
A clear police verification report was also submitted by the Commissionr of Police, Chennai.
The Passport Officer submitted that the Minister had declared in his passport application that he has not been charged with criminal proceedings nor is there any arrest warrant or summons pending before any court against him.
As per various Supreme Court judgments, it cannot be construed that the applicant has suppressed material information of criminal cases pending against him and therefore the action of the Minister does not attract relevant section of impounding of passport issued to him under the Indian Pass Ports Act, 1967, the Passport Officer told the court.
As per the orders of High Court, a copy of the decision taken by the Regional Passport Officer was submitted to the Registry of the Court.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 01 2014 | 11:20 PM IST

Next Story