Dismissing a bathch of writ petitions filed by the Registration Department alleging evasion of stamp duty Justices Nooty Ramamanohana Rao and S S Sundar said the PSU would never resort to suppressing the true market value of immovable properties.
The appeals had been filed against a similar order passed by a single judge of the High Court in 2008.
Challenging the single judge's order the appellants claimed that it would lead to loss of revenue to the state in the form of deficit in collection of stamp duty.
There was no room for one to suspect any possible evasion of state's revenue by deliberate indulgence in under-valuation.
The judges said that it was "totally unwarranted" on the part of Registration Department to initiate proceedings under Indian Stamp Act, 1899 on charges of undervaluing the property.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
