Rahul took 'too long to emerge': Book

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Mar 01 2015 | 2:45 PM IST
In the midst of an intense debate over Rahul Gandhi's future role in Congress, a new book says the young leader took "too long to emerge" and describes his 2014 Lok Sabha election campaign as "the worst" in living memory.
In the soon-to-be-released "Mandate: Will of the People" on India's recent political history, veteran journalist Vir Sanghvi looks at issues like Sonia Gandhi's refusal to become Prime Minister in 2004, and Rahul's ambivalence on major issues paving the way for a resurgent BJP to take centrestage.
The author says Rahul took "too long to emerge and when he did, it was not clear if he was for the Manmohan Singh government or against it".
He also dubs the 2014 election campaign of Rahul as "the worst" in living memory.
"Having kept away from the press and having refused to tell us where he stood on major issues, he committed political harakiri in his first interview. After that, educated Indians simply stopped paying any attention to him. He was not helped by a dreadful DAVP style advertising campaign or by the directionless nature of the Congress's campaign," he writes.
On former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, he writes, "Judged on every parameter that he had set out for himself in 2009, Manmohan Singh had been a disaster. After a wonderful first term, he had ended up being the worst prime minister in Indian history..."
Sanghvi contested Singh's declaration that history would be kinder to him than contemporary opinion, saying, "Frankly, I doubt it. He will be remembered as the man who let India down."
He also terms Sonia Gandhi as a "mystery".
"She had come out of an intensely private existence to revive the Congress and to lead it to two election victories (2004 and 2009). Where was she when all this was happening? Where were her political instincts? Did she not see that the Congress was heading for disaster?
"Nobody really knows the answers to these questions," the book, published by Westland, says.
According to Sanghvi, the logical thing for Sonia to have done was to have acceded to the party's demand to change the prime minister halfway through UPA II.
"Perhaps she was waiting for Manmohan to resign. But the same Manmohan Singh who had petulantly demanded that the party find him a majority for his nuclear deal, failing which he would resign, now determinedly clung to his chair. Even as his reputation sank lower and lower, he refused to even consider resigning.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 01 2015 | 2:45 PM IST

Next Story