SC declines plea against HC order quashing 2016 MPSC main exam

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Nov 22 2019 | 8:27 PM IST

The Supreme Court Friday refused to entertain a plea challenging the Manipur High Court verdict which quashed the Manipur Public Service Commission (Main) exam, 2016 on the ground that it was not conducted fairly and had ordered CBI probe into the matter.

A bench headed by Justice M M Shantanagoudar dismissed the plea filed by some candidates, who were selected in the 2016 main examination, challenging the high court's October 18, 2019, judgement.

The high court had passed the verdict on a batch of pleas which had raised the issue related to irregularities in the exam.

"From the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it can be safely held that the MPSC has no intention to conduct any examination in a fair and just manner. It had, in the present case, miserably failed to discharge its duties and functions as mandated in the Constitution of India," the high court had said in its judgement.

It had directed the CBI to investigate the conduct of examination by the MPSC within three months and take appropriate action.

During the arguments in the apex court, senior advocate Indira Jaising and lawyer Prashant Bhushan, appearing for those on whose petition the high court had passed the order, said that fresh exam should be conducted as the illegalities go to the root of the matter.

MPSC had issued notification in April 2016 inviting online applications for filling up 82 posts of different categories of service through the Manipur Civil Services Combined Competitive Examination, 2016 which was divided into two stages-one, preliminary and main examination.

Several candidates, who had appeared in the main examination, had approached the chief minister of Manipur alleging anomalies and irregularities in the process of conducting the examination while others had filed applications under the RTI Act for furnishing information regarding their answer sheets.

Initially, petitions were filed in high court seeking cancellation of the main examination questioning the validity and correctness of process of selection.

A single judge bench of the high court had dismissed the petitions in February 2017.

Later, a division bench of the high court allowed the appeals filed against the February 2017 order and quashed the 2016 main examination conducted by the MPSC.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 22 2019 | 8:27 PM IST

Next Story