Two lawyers, who have filed separate PILs in personal capacities against the demonetisation aimed at weeding out fake currency and black money, mentioned their matters for urgent hearing before two benches in forenoon and evening respectively.
They alleged that the sudden decision has created chaos and harassment to public at large and the notification of the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance be either quashed or be deferred for sometime.
Another Delhi-based lawyer Vivek Narayan Sharma mentioned his PIL for urgent hearing at 4 pm before a bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur and urged that it be listed tomorrow.
When he insisted for early hearing, the bench asked, "Why? How many notes do you have?"
Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, who was present in the courtroom in connection with other case, told the bench that other court has already ordered listing of similar plea on Tuesday for hearing.
The Centre meanwhile has filed a caveat in the registry saying that it be heard if the bench agrees to hear and pass any such pleas.
Pandey, in his plea, has sought quashing of the November 8 notification of the DEA.
Sharma, in his plea, has termed the notification of DEA
as "dictatorial" claiming it did not grant reasonable time to citizens for exchanging the specified bank notes to legitimate notes to avoid "large scale mayhem, life threating difficulties".
The plea has sought either quashing of the notification or a direction to the Centre for grant of "reasonable time frame" to citizens for exchanging the demonetised currency notes to avoid difficulties.
"As a result the lives, livelihood, existence, business, trade and education etc. Of billions of citizens shall get affected, in innumerable, uncalculated and uncountable ways.
"The implementation of phasing out of specified bank notes, overnight, fails the test of reasonableness and care for its citizens by the Respondent Government," the PIL said.
