Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) Pooran Chand awarded the jail term holding them guilty under various provisions of the IPC including criminal conspiracy, attempt to cheat, theft, forgery and using forged documents as genuine.
The court agreed with the CBI prosecutor's submission that economic offences were involved in this case which affected the national economy.
"It is correct that no wrongful loss or wrongful gain is caused in the present case, but conduct of all those convicts who were employees of the DGFT do not warrant any leniency because they had breached the trust bestowed upon them by the department and because they were aware and conversant with the procedure followed in the department," the court said, adding that the convicts should be dealt with strongly.
It allowed their pleas for suspension of sentence to enable them to file appeal against the judgement and released them on bail till June 17.
According to the CBI, the accused had conspired to cheat the DGFT by stealing and forging eight REP (replenishment) licences and other documents in 1994.
A case was registered on the complaint of Joint Director of DGFT that during 1992 to 1994, a criminal conspiracy was hatched and eight REP licences were stolen from the record sections of the office of DGFT. Replenishment licences are required for the purpose of trading products.
When it came to the knowledge of DGFT office, a complaint was filed with the CBI in 1994.
During trial, the accused claimed innocence and argued that the CBI probe was faulty.
