Singhania, son to meet to settle property row: HC told

Image
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Sep 04 2017 | 5:48 PM IST
The legal representatives of veteran industrialist Vijaypat Singhania and his son Gautam today informed the Bombay High Court that the two were likely to meet this week to try and resolve the property dispute between them amicably as suggested by the court.
The high court had last month suggested to the father-son duo to hold meetings, along with their lawyers, to try and arrive at an amicable solution since the dispute was personal.
Singhania has moved the high court alleging that Gautam, who is the chairperson and managing director of Raymond Ltd, is refusing to fully honour an arbitration award over a property dispute among the family members.
Raymond is yet to give him the possession of a duplex flat in the multi-storied JK House building in south Mumbai as per the award, Singhania has alleged.
Senior counsels Dinyar Madon and Janak Dwarkadas, representing Singhania and Raymond respectively, told the bench of Justice G S Kulkarni that the lawyers and the parties (the father-son duo) were scheduled to meet this week.
Following this, the judge posted the matter for further hearing on September 11.
The court said till then, its interim order, directing Raymond not to create third-party rights (sell or lease out) in the two floors of JK House, which are the subject matter of the dispute, shall continue to be in force.
As per a 2007 family agreement, Singhania, Gautam and the widow and two sons of Singhania's brother Ajaypat, are to get a duplex apartment each in JK House, which is a family property.
Singhania, in his petition, has alleged that Gautam is occupying a bigger area in JK House than he is entitled to. He has also said that Raymond failed to respond to his offers of payment to get possession of the duplex.
Thus, he was left with no choice but approach the high court, Singhania said, seeking a direction restraining Raymond from creating any rights in JK House, and the appointment of a court receiver to take possession of the duplex apartments.

Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Sep 04 2017 | 5:48 PM IST

Next Story