The government, in its affidavit, said the standing committee would meet on January 25 and consider all aspects suggested by the petitioners, and if practical, take decisions so that follow-up action could be taken by all states.
The petitioners had earlier given suggestions, including a mechanism to curb human-animal conflict, measures to reduce animal deaths on roads, highways and by electrocution and plan to protect critically endangered Great Indian Bustard.
In its affidavit, the Centre has said that considering the "magnitude" of the entire exercise, follow-up action would take at least four months, after which they would place a report before the top court.
"It is submitted that the standing committee of the wildlife board is meeting on January 25, 2018 and all the five suggestions of the petitioner can be placed before the standing committee," the affidavit said.
Regarding the suggestions pertaining to human-animal conflict and recovery plans for critically endangered Great Indian Bustard
, the government said an in-depth study has been prepared by the Ministry of Environment and Forest and Climate Change for the period 2017-2031.
"This elaborate report which is titled 'The National Wildlife Action Plan (2017-2031)' has been placed before Parliament in December 2017," it said, adding that the Centre has also issued various advisories in regard to human-wildlife conflict.
Additionally, a draft guidance document titled 'eco- friendly measures to mitigate impacts of linear infrastructure on wildlife' has been prepared on which comments were invited, it said.
It also placed before the court an elaborate document, which has been prepared in consultation with the National Highways Authority of India, in this regard.
The apex court, after a brief hearing, posted the matter for hearing in first week of April.
It had also sought the Centre's response on the PIL seeking measures, including framing of a national policy, to save endangered species like the Great Indian Bustard and snow leopard.
The petitioners had told the top court that species like Great Indian Bustards, snow leopards and wolves were on the verge of extinction and they needed to be conserved.
They had also referred to unnatural deaths of elephants on highways and railway tracks and said that areas earmarked for the largest mammal were not sufficient.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
