No big-bang push, existing schemes can still do their bit

Moving away from central schemes, Survey for replacing Soil Health Cards with fertility maps

No big-bang push, existing schemes can still do their bit
Business Standard New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 27 2016 | 12:30 PM IST
India needs a big push to boost its agricultural sector, which has been reeling under the impact of consecutive droughts, the Economic Survey 2015-16 tabled in Parliament on Friday said. However, it seemed to fall short on suggesting path-breaking steps and harped largely on existing programmes to bring about the transformation.

In some suggestions like replacing the Soil Health Cards scheme with soil fertility maps, capping sale of subsidised fertilisers and batting for market-driven seed prices, the Survey seemed to go against existing central government policies.

It identified the difficulty in exiting from well-established practices like preference for growing cereals over cash crops like pulses and oilseeds as being a primary problem, and suggested a rainbow revolution where production is in accordance with changing dietary patterns.

It also talked about rural roads, crop insurance and other programmes to improve the rural sector, but the key remains agriculture. The survey said the system of direct benefits transfers (DBT) may be considered to replace subvention of interest rates and favoured adoption of the Amul model of cooperative farming for pulses and oilseeds.

The Survey, which reflects the priorities of the government and lays down the ground work for the Union Budget that follows, has after a long-time clearly identified genetically modified and hybrid seed varieties as definite pathways to boost productivity.

It said engineering a switch towards pulses and economising water usage were cital for improving productivity. "The adoption of hybrid and high-yielding variety seeds is one definite pathway to raising productivity in Indian agriculture," the Survey said.

On irrigation, the Survey said there is scope for increasing coverage of irrigated area across the country. For this, it suggested higher public investment.

It also advocated a larger share of funds to be pumped into the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme and other employment generating schemes for creating and maintening community assets, including for removing silt from and repair of tanks and water bodies used for irrigation.

The Survey said, given that minimum support price has been largely ineffective, a deficiency price payment system where farmers are compensated directly for any drop from a fixed floor rate be considered, endorsing a suggestion of the NITI Aayog.

It batted against a recent Central government decision to control sale price of cotton seeds, including the Bt variety, saying markets should be allowed to determine price. However, it also called for enhancing competition as that can take care of cases of price rigging and cartelisation.

The Survey said given the past experiences and limitations in administratively fixing prices in India, it is desirable to let markets determine the price of seeds. The Central government through a circular issued on December 2015, had decided to fix a uniform retail price of cotton seeds in the country in the interest of farmers.

The survey also was not in favour of the initiative to provide soil health cards to farmers and said they should instead be provided with soil fertility maps to improve nutrient management.

"With over 120 million farm holdings in India, it is a big challenge to provide soil-testing facilities for overcoming the multi-nutrient deficiencies in soils to improve agricultural output."

On fertiliser subsidy, the Survey suggested that as last-mile financial inclusion in rural India is poor, which would make replacing the fertiliser subsidy with cash difficult, an alternative could be to set a cap on the number of subsidised bags each household can purchase and require biometric authentication at the point of sale.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 27 2016 | 12:10 AM IST

Next Story