SC recommends setting up commission to probe human rights violations in J&K

Article 370 case verdict: In a ruling, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul recommended setting up a commission on the lines of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission

Supreme Court recommended setting up of a commission to probe human rights violations in J&K
Supreme Court recommended setting up of a commission to probe human rights violations in J&K (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
BS Web Team New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Dec 11 2023 | 1:00 PM IST
The Supreme Court (SC) on Monday recommended an impartial investigation into the human rights violations in Jammu & Kashmir since the 1980s. In a ruling, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul recommended setting up a commission on the lines of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

"I recommend the setting up of an impartial truth and reconciliation committee to investigate and report the violations of human rights both by the state and non-state actors at least since the 1980s," Justice Kaul said.

He added, "To move forward, wounds require healing. Intergenerational trauma is felt by people. The first step to healing is to acknowledge the acts of violations by the state and its actors."

What was the Truth and Reconciliation Commission?

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was a body set up by the South African government in 1995. It was a court-like arrangement set up to uncover the human rights violations during the period of apartheid. The commission gathered information from both victims and perpetrators. The focus of the commission was on reconciliation and not persecuting the perpetrators. It released its findings in 1998 and 2003.

ALSO READArticle 370 was a temporary provision, says SC as it upholds its abrogation

SC upholds abrogation of Article 370, asks Centre to conduct polls in J&K

The SC on Monday, upheld the Centre's decision to abrogate Article 370 and said that steps should be taken to conduct elections in the assembly by September 30, 2024. The Apex court also directed that statehood to the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir be restored as soon as possible.

The five-judge bench unanimously said that Article 370 of the Constitution was a temporary provision and the president has the power to revoke it.

The court also upheld the validity of the decision to carve out the union territory of Ladakh from Jammu and Kashmir on August 5, 2019.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Article 370D Y ChandrachudJammu and KashmirLadakhSupreme Courtchief justices of IndiaChief Justice of IndiaSouth Africahuman rights violationsHuman RightsIndia human rightsapartheidBS Web Reports

First Published: Dec 11 2023 | 1:00 PM IST

Next Story