Piyush Goyal quizzes Chinese trade minister Showen on dumping of goods

He asked Chinese Vice Trade Minister, Wang Shouwen, whether China regretted that India did not join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)

Piyush Goyal
Piyush Goyal
Asit Ranjan Mishra
4 min read Last Updated : Aug 26 2023 | 1:37 PM IST
The audience at the B20 event was in for a surprise on Friday as Trade Minister Piyush Goyal decided to play the moderator and devil’s advocate at the G20 trade ministers’ session, posing some tough questions to his counterparts.

He asked Chinese Vice Trade Minister, Wang Shouwen, whether China regretted that India did not join the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). 

Shouwen replied: “The China-India trade relationship is growing very fast. Last year, our bilateral trade reached $130 billion. If there had been an FTA (free trade agreement), either bilaterally or in RCEP context, the trade potential between the two countries would be much further tapped. It would benefit our two peoples. It is your decision whether or not you will join RCEP, but our doors are always open.”

Goyal quipped that his concern was slightly different. “We are already concerned about bilateral trade, even though $130 billion is largely skewed in favour of China. Indian industry feels, if we had entered into RCEP, our trade deficit would also have risen further along with the increase in trade. We just can’t seem to understand the pricing. The cost at which you are supplying goods is a matter all ministers would like to know. How can you supply goods at less than the raw material cost?”

Shouwen avoided giving a direct reply, saying: “I would like to congratulate you for being a very successful trade minister for India because even though you are not able to balance your trade with each of your trading partners, you have been successful in maintaining a global trade balance overall for your country. It is natural that you will have a trade deficit with countries like China, but you will also have trade surpluses with other countries.”

Speaking to US Trade Representative (USTR) Katherine Tai, Goyal remarked that of the three USTRs he had worked with, his working relationship with Tai was the best. He asked Tai whether other countries should also use the template set by India and the US for resolving WTO (World Trade Organization) disputes bilaterally. The two countries recently agreed to settle six of their seven WTO disputes out of the court.

“In terms of trade disputes, trade frictions, trade disagreements, they happen all the time. When it comes to dispute settlement, the critical moment in every disagreement is the point where there is a political alignment of will to resolve the issue as much as possible. What we have done together is to demonstrate that commitment, and that alignment of political will. What we have done is, I agree, a template that breaks the pattern of partnership between the US and India,” Tai replied. 

To the EU Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis, Goyal asked whether the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) would be a threat to open borders and expanding trade. “When we were designing this measure, we were putting a lot of attention to make sure that it was WTO-compatible and hence non-discriminatory. We are putting the same price of carbon on imported goods that we are putting on domestic producers, and any price of carbon paid in other countries will be deducted,” he added.

To the Switzerland State Secretary for Economic Affairs Helene Budliger Artieda, who is leading the talks for an FTA with India on behalf of the four-nation European Free Trade Association (Efta) grouping, Goyal said India could help Swiss companies produce pharma products faster, and make medicines available for the whole world at more competitive price. Switzerland is very strong in research and innovation, particularly in the pharma sector. “So we would look forward to more innovative partnerships with your companies,” Goyal added.

“It is very difficult to pitch Efta to Indians, but it is very easy to pitch India to Switzerland. Everybody sees the opportunities. This is my fourth visit this year, and that shows we are highly interested. We are hopefully racing to the finishing line. I am counting on an excellent office on your side,” Artieda said.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :RCEPPiyush GoyalRegional Comprehensive Economic PartnershipG20

First Published: Aug 25 2023 | 9:30 PM IST

Next Story