Business Standard

Seeking balance between controlled, skewed pricing in favour of urea

Some in the industry fear a return of controls while others see positives in a govt circular, but the bigger issue is the skewed pricing in favour of urea

fertilisers agriculture
Premium

The ministry’s recent memorandum allows companies to charge profit over their total cost, including cost of production and a host of other items, or import according to three slabs

Sanjeeb Mukherjee New Delhi
A few days back, the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilisers issued an office memorandum that sought to cap the profit margin on the retail sale price of phosphate and potassic fertilisers charged by companies under the Nutrient-Based Subsidy (NBS) regime.
 
Di-ammonia phosphate (DAP), Muriate of Potash (MOP), and different grades of NPK (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) are the most commonly used non-urea fertilisers in the country. DAP is the second most-consumed. For urea, the largest consum­ed fertiliser, no such margin control has been proposed as it is already sold at a fixed rate that has not been revised for more than

What you get on BS Premium?

  • Unlock 30+ premium stories daily hand-picked by our editors, across devices on browser and app.
  • Pick your 5 favourite companies, get a daily email with all news updates on them.
  • Full access to our intuitive epaper - clip, save, share articles from any device; newspaper archives from 2006.
  • Preferential invites to Business Standard events.
  • Curated newsletters on markets, personal finance, policy & politics, start-ups, technology, and more.
VIEW ALL FAQs

Need More Information - write to us at assist@bsmail.in