Audit firms may also face action in Satyam-like cases

Image
Joe C Mathew New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 11 2018 | 10:14 AM IST

New Companies Bill to propose equal responsibility of auditors, firms.

Unlike in the multi-crore Satyam fraud, audit firms will not be able to wash their hands of corporate scams perpetrated by companies in connivance with their partner auditors.

The Companies Bill, 2011, being finalised by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), would seek to make audit firms and auditors equally responsible for such wrongdoing, said a senior official.

MCA had assured a parliamentary panel that looked into an earlier version of the Bill that it would ensure that audit firms did not escape by putting the blame on auditors.

The need for such a clause was felt after B Ramalinga Raju, founder of the erstwhile Satyam Computer Services, admitted to having cooked the company’s account books to show non-existent profits. The fraud was estimated to be of the order of Rs 10,000 crore.

While Satyam’s auditors — chartered accountants who were partners of associate audit firms of global consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers — were arrested for alleged collusion with the management, the audit firms were left untouched.

Under the current law, besides criminal proceedings, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) can bar the guilty auditors from doing auditing work for a specified period.

Under the ICAI Act, members found guilty of professional misconduct can be barred from practice for up to five years or fined up to Rs 5 lakh. However, no action could be taken against the firms, either under the ICAI Act or the Companies Act.

ICAI is conducting disciplinary proceedings against two PriceWaterhouse auditors, Srinivas Talluri and S Gopalakrishnan, for erroneous auditing of Satyam’s books.

The Bill would propose that if the audit partner or partners were proved to have acted in a fraudulent manner or abetted or colluded in any fraud by the company, its directors or officers, the audit firms would be equally liable for civil or criminal proceedings.

The parliamentary panel welcomed the stringent proposals.

The Companies Bill, 2011, would also propose a maximum of 10 years imprisonment, besides a fine of up to three times the amount involved in the fraud, for the guilty auditors.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 25 2011 | 12:31 AM IST

Next Story