Bombay HC seeks Shapoorji Pallonji's reply over Tata Trust chief's plea

In its complaint filed in September, the company had claimed that Venkatramanan, on May 30, issued a false, frivolous, baseless and defamatory press statement against it

Carte blanche to notify law requires reform
Press Trust of India Mumbai
Last Updated : Dec 07 2018 | 11:11 PM IST
The Bombay High Court Friday sought the response of Shapoorji Pallonji Pvt Ltd in a petition filed by managing trustee of Tata Trusts R Venkatramanan seeking to quash a notice issued by a lower court in a defamation complaint lodged against him by the company.

On October 11, a magistrate court issued process (notice) against Venkatramanan following a complaint of defamation filed by Shapoorji Pallonji Pvt Ltd under section 500 of the IPC.

Justice Mridula Bhatkar Friday directed the company to file its affidavit and posted Venkatramanan's petition for hearing on December 17.

In its complaint filed in September, the company had claimed that Venkatramanan, on May 30, issued a false, frivolous, baseless and defamatory press statement against it.

The statement was issued after the CBI lodged an FIR against Venkatramanan and others in the AirAsia alleged corruption case.

Venkatramanan, who is also a director with AirAsia India Ltd, in the press statement had refuted the allegations levelled against him.

He had further claimed that the FIR contained charges which he believes stem from the malicious and defamatory allegations made by former Tata Group chairman Cyrus Mistry and Shapoorji Pallonji Pvt Ltd in their pleadings before the National Company Law Tribunal.
In his petition filed in the high court, Venkatramanan has claimed that a defamation complaint can only be filed by an aggrieved person and not by a company.

"Only a person who has directly or indirectly suffered his or her own reputation can move the court and file a complaint," it said.

The petition claimed the company has failed to show as to how it is a party aggrieved by the alleged defamatory press statement.

The petition has sought the high court's direction to quash and set aside the magistrate's order issuing process against Venkatramanan.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 07 2018 | 4:20 PM IST

Next Story