IL&FS crisis: Independent directors to ask why nominees still on board

The government plea has asked for suspension of seven members of the board, and appointment of 10 directors

IL&FS
Surajeet Das Gupta New Delhi
Last Updated : Oct 04 2018 | 5:30 AM IST
Ousted independent directors of the Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services are planning to question the logic of the government in not seeking suspension of the shareholder nominees to the board. 

They plan to raise this issue in their response to the government petition in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). After pronouncing its interim order, the tribunal has given respondents up to October 15 to file replies.

“It is a mystery as to why the nominee directors of the key shareholders have been left out in the superseding of the board, when they have a higher stake in the running of the company and all the powers to raise capital. Independent directors can only advice,” said a former independent director. 

He also pointed out nominee directors represented financial institutions such as Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), State Bank of India, Central Bank of India, and Orix Corporation, Japan. All of these are key shareholders of IL&FS. 

“All of them had the clout to raise equity capital, as it was clear that there was no leeway to raise more short-term loans,” the director added. 


The government plea has asked for suspension of seven members of the board, and appointment of 10 directors. Those identified for ouster are Hari Sankaran, former managing director; Arun Kumar Saha, whole-time director; and independent directors R C Bharagava, Michael Pinto, and Jaithirth Rao, among others. 

The NCLT order had allowed suspension of the board and replacing it with a six-member board, with banker Uday Kotak as the non-executive chairman. 
It is still not clear whether or not the nominee directors representing the shareholders will continue to be part of the board or new representatives will be appointed. 

Independent directors have said nominee directors did not endorse numerous suggestions made to raise capital. They pointed out that they were aware of the looming crisis nearly two to three years back and had suggested various options, including the sale of ILF&S.

Ajay Piramal, chairman of the Piramal Group, had even made an offer, but was stalled by LIC. 

Suggestions had also been made for an initial public offering, but the shareholder nominees did not support it either. Senior LIC executives, however, said they were open to all means of monetisation.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story