Associate Sponsors

Co-sponsor

Madras HC disposes of Renault Nissan petition in sales tax dispute case

The petition was filed by the company challenging an order by the Tax authorities revising the assessment made under the Central Sales Tax Act, for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16

Madras High Court, Madras HC,
Madras High Court. (Photo: ANI)
BS Reporter
Last Updated : Oct 24 2018 | 8:58 AM IST

The Madras High Court has issued an order disposing a petition of automobile manufacturer Renault Nissan Automative India Pvt Ltd (RNAIPL) leaving options for the company to approach the appellate authority in connection with a sales tax dispute it has with the State authorities.

The petition was filed by the company challenging an order by the Tax authorities revising the assessment made under the Central Sales Tax Act, for the assessment years 2014-15 and 2015-16. The dispute was related to the products the company sold to the neighbouring states, on which the State government has sought the Value Added Tax (VAT). The company has argued that it would fall under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and the tax rate is two per cent.

Additional Advocate General Narmadha Sampath, who appeared for The Deputy Commissioner - II Large Tax Payer Unit, confirmed that such an order has been passed and said that the State government's argument has been accepted and the company has been asked to approach the appellate authority, which would require the company to deposit some money upfront on the dispute.

The State government has earlier alleged that the company floated two marketing firms within Tamil Nadu, selling all the products from manufacturing company to the marketing company, which would attract 14.5 per cent Value Added Tax, which has to be reimbursed by the State government according to an MoU signed between the company and the State government when the automaker set up its facility in Tamil Nadu.

It may be noted that the company has earlier approached the international arbitration tribunal over a Rs 50 billion unpaid incentives and damages. Both the sides has earlier informed the Madras High Court in another matter that negotiations are going on between the company and the State government on settling this dispute out of court.

 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Next Story