The service tax department has contended that as the overseas units were rendering a service to OVL, the company was liable to pay service tax in full.
OVL has stakes in 37 oil and gas projects in 17 countries. These stakes are held through subsidiaries, branches and joint ventures. For operations of these projects, those units and joint ventures would raise a demand for money on the parent, OVL, which would transmit the investments.
“What is a bigger matter of concern is why an amount paid to joint ventures or subsidiaries was charged to the profit & loss account instead of carrying it in the balance sheet,” said Rakesh Nangia, managing partner, Nangia & Co. "The service tax department has very clearly stated that the demand was drawn from foreign currency expenditure reported in the company's financial statements. Prima facie, the case is clear that foreign currency expenditure would have also resulted in import of service on which service tax has to be paid.”
The tax amount was calculated based on foreign currency expenditure reported in the company's financial statements from April 1, 2006 to March 31, 2010.
The department first issued a demand-cum-show-cause notice on October 11, 2011, requiring OVL to show-cause why service tax amounting to Rs 2,816.31 crore plus interest on such amount and penalty should not be demanded and recovered. Subsequently, five more demand-cum-show-cause notices were issued covering up to March 31, 2015, to show-cause why service tax amounting to Rs 3,286.36 crore, the interest on such amount and penalty should not be demanded and recovered from the company.
The Service Tax Department, sources said, had contended that the expenses represented business auxiliary services rendered by the company's foreign branches and operator of joint venture/consortium to the company.
According to OVL, investments made overseas through subsidiaries or branches or joint ventures do not constitute availing of any service.
It also contended that a high service tax rate of 14-15 per cent on such investments, which have an internal rate of return of 12-13 per cent, would lead to negative returns, making the project “infructuous”. Also, it argued that service tax by law can be levied on services rendered within the country. And even if one were to assume that its branches or subsidiaries were rendering any service, they were all overseas and not within India and so cannot be subject to any service tax.
OVL had reported a net loss of Rs 2,093.5 crore in 2015-16 on a turnover of Rs 12,772 crore. It had a net profit of Rs 1,904.2 crore on a turnover of Rs 19,148.9 crore in the previous financial year.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)