The case, where RIL has been accused of making unlawful gains through alleged violation of insider trading norms, has been before the Securities Appelate Tribubal for a long time.
RIL had approached SAT after Sebi refused to settle the case through its 'consent settlement mechanism', while norms were also tightened for such settlements in May 2012, while excluding insider trading cases from their ambit.
The SAT, which hears appeals against decisions of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), last month sought more clarity on the issues related to RIL's appeal as also on the mechanism at Sebi for deciding on consent pleas.
Giving an update on the case in its latest Annual Report for the fiscal 2013-14, being sent to RIL shareholders ahead of their AGM on June 18, Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) has said that Sebi has issued Show Cause Notices during last three years in connection with three issues.
These three matters have been listed by RIL as "sale of shares of erstwhile Reliance Petroleum Limited; the allotment of the Company's equity shares to certain companies against detachable warrants attached to privately placed debentures issued by the company; and disclosure of Earnings Per Share and diluted Earnings Per Share in the filing with Stock Exchanges in respect of shares against warrants issued in April, 2007."
"The company has submitted its reply for the same," RIL added.
RIL has clarified in the annual report that "there has been no instance of non-compliance by the company on any matter related to capital markets during last three years, and hence, no penalties or strictures have been imposed on the company by stock exchanges or Sebi".
Sebi began investigating RIL in 2008 for allegedly making profits from insider information on Reliance Petroleum, then a subsidiary company which later got merged with it.
The first show-cause notice is believed to have been issued in 2010, after which RIL sought to settle the matter through consent mechanism, which allow settlement of a case without admission or denial of guilt.
Ever since Sebi rejected the consent plea, the matter has been before the SAT.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)