Overseas probe against Adani firms revived as SC stays Bombay HC order

The investigation is part of a larger probe by the revenue department for over-invoicing of imported coal and power plant equipment by several Indian electricity producers

Gautam Adani | File photo
The DRI alleges Gautam Adani firms had overvalued imported coal consignments to avail of tax benefits
Agencies New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Jan 09 2020 | 3:21 AM IST
The Supreme Court has revived the revenue department’s bid to investigate billionaire Gautam Adani’s companies, which it claims got undue tax benefits by overvaluing coal imports.

A three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde on Wednesday put on hold the Bombay High Court's decision to quash all letters rogatory (LRs) sent by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) to Singapore and other countries. This will allow the revenue office to seek information on the case from overseas. The apex court also asked Adani Enterprises and Adani Power to submit their stance.

LRs are sent to investigative or judicial agencies in other countries when some information is required during a probe of off-shore entities.

The DRI alleges that the Adani group companies had overvalued about 1,300 consignments of coal imported from Indonesia to avail tax benefits in India between 2010 and 2016. 

The group routed the imports through several countries and siphoned off money, according to the agency.

Requests to cooperate with the investigation were sent to Singapore, the UAE, Hong Kong, and the British Virgin Islands in 2016. The high court ruling had invalidated these requests last year, but the Supreme Court decision means the investigation can continue for now. The top court said it would hear the case again after two weeks.
 
Representatives for the Adani group didn’t immediate reply to an email seeking comment. The Adani group has in the past denied the allegations.

The investigation is part of a larger probe by the revenue department for over-invoicing of imported coal and power plant equipment by several Indian electricity producers. Power tariffs in India broadly consist of two parts -- the equipment cost and variable charges such as fuel. The companies benefited by seeking higher power tariffs and compensation for increased cost of fuel, according to submissions by the probe agency in the lower court.

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Adani ElectricityAdani GroupBombay High CourtGautam Adani

Next Story