Judge P Naveen Rao said: “There shall be interim status quo as prayed for.” In their petition, Tammali Shiva Kumar and Undi Venkatasubbajaru, said to be investors in the two drug firms, requested the court to direct the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) not to give its in-principle approval to the merger or an arrangement or an amalgamation of Sun Pharma and Ranbaxy. They sought that Sebi, BSE and the National Stock Exchange (NSE) be directed to probe insider trading in Ranbaxy shares and take appropriate action under the law.
The petitioners also sought action against Sun Pharma and its wholly-owned arm Silverstreet Developers LLP. According to them, high-volume transactions in shares and increase in the stock price three days before announcement of the proposed merger imply there was extensive trading by people with prior knowledge of the proposed deal. They said Silverstreet and Sun Pharma, actively involved in the merger negotiations, were in possession of price-sensitive information.
Silverstreet had in the March quarter bought nearly six million shares of Ranbaxy. Denying there was any insider trading, Sun Pharma had earlier said in a statement that its subsidiary’s share purchase was being annulled as part of the merger deal.
The court has issued notices to Sebi, BSE, NSE, and the three companies (Sun Pharma, Silverstreet and Ranbaxy) to respond to the petitioners’ charges.
On the court order, Sun Pharma has said: “We have not received any such communication. At Sun Pharma, we hold ourselves to the highest standards of corporate governance and business ethics. Our code of conduct serves as a compass that guides the actions of our employees and directors, ensuring consistent and uncompromising integrity as we build trusted relationships around the world. The matter related to purchase of Ranbaxy shares does not violate insider-trading rules. With regard to the petition filed, the matter is sub judice, so we cannot make specific comments, but we would be taking appropriate action as advised by our legal counsel.”
Meanwhile, a separate set of investors has filed another petition seeking that the court direct Sebi to probe the insider-trading angle, as sought by the earlier petitioners. The matter is expected to come up for hearing on May 5.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)