The memorandum covers Tata Steel’s Scunthorpe steelworks, mills in Teesside, Dalzell and Clydebridge in Scotland, an engineering workshop in Workington and a rail consultancy in York, as well as operations in France and Germany, according to a statement by the company.
| ON THE BLOCK |
Assets covered in the MoU
Source: Company statement |
Explaining the rationale for this decision, Koehler said: “We are making huge strides on our strategic journey to become a premium, customer-centred steel company thanks to investment in equipment, technology and customers, together with the substantial contributions from our employees.”
The European steel industry is emerging from one of the most challenging periods in its history. Tata Steel has invested £1.2 billion in its UK operations since acquiring Corus in 2007.
“We are extremely disappointed with the way Tata Steel has handled this announcement, which does not reflect well on Tata’s values,” said Roy Rickhuss, general secretary of the Steelworkers’ Union Community.
“Tata Steel has failed to consult at all with the trade unions before making this move, which could have serious consequences for employees and contractors right across Tata Steel, not just within the long products business that it wants to sell. The fact that Tata Steel wants to abandon half of its European operations and pull out of an entire strategic market does not bode well for the future and ends Tata Steel’s vision to be a global steel player," international media reported quoting the unions.
Analysts said the move would help the company to restructure its European operations. “The long product division accounts for about 4.5-5 million tonne capacity, which is 25 per cent of Europe’s existing capacity of 17 million tonnes,” said an analyst with a foreign brokerage.
“The company’s long product division was not doing well,” said Giriraj Daga, senior analyst with Nirmal Bang Securities. “They did manage to get a few orders but overall it was not doing good,” he said. On the likely valuation of the deal, Daga said, “Noting the capacity of the division and keeping in mind the enterprise value, I think Tata Steel should look for at least $1.3 billion from the sale of the unit.”
“The decision by Tata Steel to sell its long products division has nothing to do with the financial health of Tata Steel as a company. Tata Steel is actually in good financial health with estimates that point towards better financial performance in the next couple of years," said Sourindra Banerjee, assistant professor of marketing at the Warwick Business School.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)