Tata Power has asserted it did not waive its right as a bidder by not participating in the entire process for Rs 20,000 crore Sasan Power Project though admitting in the Supreme Court that it could not have matched successful bid by rival Reliance Power.
In its rejoinder to the government affidavit in a petition filed by it against the decision to allow use of coal from captive mines for Sasan for other projects, the Tata group firm said it could not be debarred from challenging the subsequent arbitrary actions of the Centre.
"The petitioner having participated in the entire bidding process cannot be said to have waived its right as a bidder by not extending its bid," it said, adding that decisions subsequent to tendering process would make the award of contract "entirely meaningless".
Tata Power further submitted that the bidding process of the Sasan was never "meant or intended to vest" the successful bidder with the right to get extra coal of 9 million ton per annum, to be used by Reliance Power for developing other power projects.
Rejoinder has come over an affidavit filed by the centre, in which the government had submitted that the Tata Power's petition was "misleading and erroneous".
In the affidavit, the government had also questioned the locus standi of Tata Power, saying, "The petitioner cannot allege violation of any legal right vis-a-vis tender process, as it waived its right by not extending the bid."
The government said that the petition challenging the use of coal for projects other than the 4,000-MW Sasan Ultra-Mega Power Project (UMPP) was filed on a totally false basis and "gives a totally misleading and erroneous impression".
Today, during the proceedings of the Supreme Court, senior advocate Harish Salve appearing for the Tata group had asked Apex Court's permission to file rejoinder.
This was accepted by a bench comprising Justices G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly and adjourned the matter to September 13 for next hearing.
Tata Power has challenged the decision of an Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) which had allowed R-Power to use excess coal from the captive mines meant for the Sasan project in Madhya Pradesh for another 4,000-MW project at Chitrangi, in the same state.
In the rejoinder Tata also denied the government's allegation that it filed "false averments" before the court and tried to hide fact that it was informed by the ministry that extra coal would be allowed to be diverted.
"Government is deliberately misreading the petitioner's case.... The petitioner has at all times proceeded by lumping all three coal blocks allocated to Sasan as captive coal mines," Tata submitted, adding that government by exercising its power converted the "captive mines for the project to a captive mine for the promoter".
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
