The patents granted to TVS are expected to improve fuel economy, spur performance and lower emissions. The patents battle between the two companies has been going on for over a decade.
Of the two patents, an application for cylinder head assembly was filed on August 24, 2007, and another on multi valve cylinder head assembly was filed on October 12, 2007.
Also Read
The second is related to an invention for smaller capacity vehicles in order to improve performance. Bajaj Auto has submitted its pre-grant opposition, raising grounds, including that the subject matter of the application is anticipated, obvious and does not involve any inventive step, among others.
It has also filed a common written submission for two applications, and has also alleged that filing of the patent application on October 12 amounts to duplication.
M Ajith, deputy controller of patents and designs, patents office, Chennai, while considering both the applications separately, granted both the patents after considering and hearing arguments of both sides. “In view of all the above mentioned discussion in light of all the submissions of the learned agents of the opponents and learned agent for the applicants along with the submitted documents, the pre-grant representations are hereby dismissed. I find claimed invention is novel and inventive in accordance with the Patents Act,” said the official, while allowing the applications to proceed for grant with amended claims. Emails sent to both the companies did not elicit a response.
Both the auto majors, which compete on market share, had locked horns in certain instances, including on the intellectual property dispute on TVS Motor’s twin spark plug configuration used in its motorcycle model Flame, which Bajaj said is an infringement of its patent, according to legal experts.
According to reports, in another instance, Bajaj Auto has filed a pre-grant opposition against TVS Motor’s patent application on a shock absorber with helper spring, in which the patent office denied patent protection to TVS’ claimed invention. The order was passed in July 2016. Many of these litigations have seen both these companies going for appeal against an order.
Why the fight
- One of the patents is for cylinder head assembly that was filed on August 24, 2007, and another on multi valve cylinder head assembly was filed on October 12, 2007
- Bajaj Auto submitted its pre-grant opposition, claiming that the subject matter of the application does not involve any inventive step
- While considering both the applications separately, an official says he found the claimed invention is in accordance with the Patents Act
One subscription. Two world-class reads.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)