2G scam: Court imposes Rs 1 lakh penalty on Shahid Balwa

Special CBI Judge O P Saini, however, did not allow the contention of CBI to cancel bail of Balwa

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-133683230/stock-photo-scales-of-justice-gavel-and-books.html" target="_blank">Gavel</a> image via Shutterstock
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : May 30 2014 | 1:29 PM IST
A special court today imposed a penalty of Rs one lakh on Swan Telecom promoter Shahid Usman Balwa, who had sought permission to withdraw answers given by him earlier to the court in the 2G scam case trial, while allowing his plea to record afresh his statement before it.

Special CBI Judge O P Saini, however, did not allow the contention of CBI to cancel bail of Balwa, an accused in the 2G case.

The court passed the order on Balwa's plea seeking permission to withdraw his answers given earlier during his deposition.

Also Read

CBI had argued in court that Balwa's plea was nothing but a "sinister design" to take the court for a "ride".

During the arguments, Special Public Prosecutor U U Lalit had submitted that Balwa's earlier contention that he had failed to understand the questions asked by the court under the provisions of CrPC was not an "inadvertent error" and it was a "smart and calculated" move.

He had also contended that it was a "breach of faith" reposed by the court on the accused and he must be fair to the court.

Balwa's counsel, however, had submitted that it was only an inadvertent error and that nothing had been done deliberately.

On CBI's contentions that bail granted earlier to Balwa may be cancelled, his lawyer had said it was not the case that his client has tampered with evidence or threatened any witness.

The counsel had also said that if the court feels that something wrong has been done, he was offering unconditional apology.

CBI had earlier sought cancellation of the bail granted to Balwa, facing trial in the 2G case, saying his conduct requires reconsideration and recall of the relief given to him.

Balwa had faced the court's ire when it observed that he "deserved" to be taken into custody for his misconduct.

He had filed a plea contending that he will "not raise any question of prejudice caused to him on grounds of non- understanding of any question asked by the court.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: May 30 2014 | 1:10 PM IST

Next Story