The drastic remarks against the Bill by the chief minister came during his third address in the ongoing debate on the Bill in the Assembly. His observations drew instant and sharp reactions from the members of the House, including from his own party and the Opposition.
Putting the chief minister in a defensive mode, leader of Opposition N Chandrababu Naidu, MIM leader Akbaruddin Owaisi and CPI (M) member J Ranga Reddy among others questioned him as to why he did not say this upfront and sought to return the Bill before it was taken up for discussion in the Assembly.
"Why did you waste the time of the Assembly and the members all these days when you think the Bill had loopholes?" they questioned the chief minister.
As if to answer this question, the chief minister had given a notice to the Assembly Speaker seeking to return the Bill to the President soon after the House was adjourned for the day in the afternoon. A similar notice was given to the chairman of the state Legislative Council by minister C Ramachandraiah, who is leader of the Council.
The President had sent the Bill to the state legislative Assembly on December 11 for sending its views within six weeks, which ended on January 23. However, the debate continued beyond this deadline as the President extended the time by one more week up to January 30 after the chief minister requested Rashtrapati Bhawan to give four more weeks to debate.
Making a high pitch speech in the Assembly, Reddy said the Bill was sent to the state without even enclosing the statement of objectives and reasons while it was meaningless to discuss it without even knowing the basis on which it was mooted. He also pointed out the President, in his communication, had termed it as a Bill while the secretary of the Ministry of Home Affairs termed it as a draft Bill when he had sought for additional information on the subject.
"It only shows that there was no clarity on several aspects of the ongoing exercise within the government at the Centre. Everybody has to act within the framework of the Constitution and not otherwise," the chief minister said though he later clarified it was the mistake of the Home Ministry official to term it a draft Bill.
Reddy also stated during his address that he had told the Congress leadership at the beginning itself that he cannot stay as chief minister if the state is going to be divided as it causes more pain to him than the death of his father.
Meanwhile, TRS members and other political parties from the Telangana region accused Kiran Kumar Reddy of acting in an unconstitutional manner on the issue of AP Reorganisation Bill. It is not yet clear what decision Speaker, N Manohar, is going to take on the chief minister's notice.
Earlier this week, Reddy excused himself from going to Delhi when he was asked to attend a party meeting to discuss Rajya Sabha candidates stating he was busy with the Assembly debate on the bifurcation Bill.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)