The proposal would be sent to President Pranab Mukherjee, who would forward it to the chief justice for a probe, based on the three points raised in the reference: Allegation of sexual harassment against Ganguly, his visit to Pakistan without informing the West Bengal government and taking an arbitration assignment from the All-India Football Federation despite holding the top post at the human rights body.
Ganguly said he needed some time to decide on the next course of action. “I don’t want to comment now. Please give me some time. Later on, I will let you know,” Ganguly was quoted as saying by PTI.
In another decision, the Cabinet asked a committee of secretaries to formulate an action-taken report on the high-powered Justice M B Shah Commission report on illegal mining in Odisha. The report, which runs into five voluminous parts, was on Thursday brought before the Cabinet. The action-taken report and the Shah panel report would be tabled in Parliament, Finance Minister P Chidambaram said here.
In the Ganguly issue, the home ministry placed before the Cabinet the views of Attorney-General G E Vahanvati, who had noted that a case can be made out against Ganguly, following the allegation of “unwelcome behaviour” towards a woman law intern, officials said. The attorney-general had sent his suggestions after these were sought by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, who had written to the President seeking Ganguly’s removal as chairman of West Bengal Human Rights Commission. Officials said the attorney-general was asked to state if any case can be made out on the three issues.
The Protection of Human Rights Act states a chairperson or member of NHRC or a state human rights commission can only be removed “by order of the President of India on the grounds of proven misbehaviour or incapacity after the Supreme Court, on reference being made to it by the President, has, on enquiry... Reported that the chairperson or the member, as the case may be, ought on any such ground to be removed”.
The Shah commission report, which the Cabinet referred to a secretaries’ panel, had severely indicted the Centre and the Odisha government for the illegal mining of iron and manganese ores and asked the state to recover over Rs 59,203 crore from the miners. It had also recommended granting all mining leases via the auction route.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)