Presidential reference on Ganguly's removal cleared

Ganguly says he needs some time to decide on the next course of action

BS Reporter New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 03 2014 | 1:44 AM IST
The Cabinet on Thursday approved a proposal  to send a presidential reference to the Supreme Court to conduct a probe into the allegation of sexual harassment against retired apex court judge A K Ganguly.

The proposal would be sent to President Pranab Mukherjee, who would forward it to the chief justice for a probe, based on the three points raised in the reference: Allegation of sexual harassment against Ganguly, his visit to Pakistan without informing the West Bengal government and taking an arbitration assignment from the All-India Football Federation despite holding the top post at the human rights body.

Ganguly said he needed some time to decide on the next course of action. “I don’t want to comment now. Please give me some time. Later on, I will let you know,” Ganguly was quoted as saying by PTI.

In another decision, the Cabinet asked a committee of secretaries to formulate an action-taken report on the high-powered Justice M B Shah Commission report on illegal mining in Odisha. The report, which runs into five voluminous parts, was on Thursday brought before the Cabinet. The action-taken report and the Shah panel report would be tabled in Parliament, Finance Minister P Chidambaram said here.

In the Ganguly issue, the home ministry placed before the Cabinet the views of Attorney-General G E Vahanvati, who had noted that a case can be made out against Ganguly, following the allegation of “unwelcome behaviour” towards a woman law intern, officials said. The attorney-general had sent his suggestions after these were sought by West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, who had written to the President seeking Ganguly’s removal as chairman of West Bengal Human Rights Commission. Officials said the attorney-general was asked to state if any case can be made out on the three issues.

The Protection of Human Rights Act states a chairperson or member of NHRC or a state human rights commission can only be removed “by order of the President of India on the grounds of proven misbehaviour or incapacity after the Supreme Court, on reference being made to it by the President, has, on enquiry... Reported that the chairperson or the member, as the case may be, ought on any such ground to be removed”.

The Shah commission report, which the Cabinet referred to a secretaries’ panel, had severely indicted the Centre and the Odisha government for the illegal mining of iron and manganese ores and asked the state to recover over Rs 59,203 crore from the miners. It had also recommended granting all mining leases via the auction route.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 03 2014 | 12:25 AM IST

Next Story