CBI response sought by SC on sharing FIPB docs with Karti

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A M Khanwilkar, and Justice D Y Chandrachud also asked the agency if a Division Bench (two judges) be asked to examine the validity of its LoC

Karti Chidambaram.  Illustration: Binay Sinha
Karti Chidambaram. ILLustration: Binay Sinha
IANS New Delhi
4 min read Last Updated : Oct 23 2019 | 11:18 AM IST

The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked the CBI if it was ready to share with Karti Chidambaram, son of senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, the documents the agency submitted to the court in a sealed cover in the lookout circular case.

Karti Chidambram is facing a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for his alleged role in facilitating the 2007 Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance for INX Media Ltd when his father P Chidambaram was the Union Finance Minister.

A bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra, Justice A M Khanwilkar, and Justice D Y Chandrachud also asked the agency if a Division Bench (two judges) be asked to examine the validity of its lookout circular against Karti Chidambaram.

Asking the CBI to come back with its response on October 9, the court said Karti Chidambram could move the designated court for permission to travel abroad.

The court's directions came in the course of hearing of a CBI challenge to a Madras High Court order that stayed its lookout circular against Karti Chidambaram which the agency issued to ensure that he did not leave the country.

The top court, by its August 14 order, had restored the lookout circular by putting on hold the High Court order.

"You have to satisfy the court on the evidence collected during the investigation in support of allegation of various wrongdoings by Karti Chidambaram," the court told Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, adding that everything should be on the strength of law and nothing else.

Mehta told the court that Karti Chidambaram had gone aboard twice -- in May and June -- and used his visits to tamper with evidence in the case.

Pointing to alleged involvement of Karti Chidambaram in various wrongdoings, Mehta said: "These are not based on statements by people. These are based on contemporaneous official records."

"If he is permitted to go out of India, he will return. He may return, I presume," Mehta said and then pointed to the FIR in the INX Media case and said that an FIR was a starting point in any case.

As the Additional Solicitor General claimed that Karti Chidambaram held several undisclosed assets, the latter's counsel Kapil Sibal asked him to show at least one such property.

Sibal told the court that the case before it rests on a particular transaction wherein Advantage Strategic Consultant company was paid Rs 10 lakh allegedly for facilitating FIPB clearance to INX Media.

Sibal said that though his client was not even a shareholder in the company, he was projected as alleged beneficiary of the said payment.

Sibal said his client may be involved in alleged violation of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act or other laws, but evidence collected in those cases can't be brought before the court in the matter relating to INX Media for sustaining the lookout circular.

When the court questioned him on this count, Sibal said: "That is the problem of criminal law. A lookout circular is for a particular transaction. You can't justify that lookout circular on the strength of material the CBI is producing now."

Justifying the continued operation of the lookout circular against Karti Chidambaram, the CBI had on September 22 told the apex court that he held several overseas accounts in which he had transferred money.

During the September 11 hearing, the agency indicated that Karti Chidambram had 25 offshore properties.

Karti Chidambram denied it and told the apex court that the CBI should disclose any of the overseas assets allegedly held by him or his family and seize them.

Karti Chidambaram is alleged to have received Rs 3.5 crore from Mumbai-based INX media, now 9X Media, for helping it get FIPB clearance when it was run by Peter and Indrani Mukerjea, both accused in the Sheena Bora murder case.

The FIR in the case does not mention Chidambaram senior, though it said he cleared the FIPB approval for Rs 4.62 crore of Foreign Direct Investment in the firm at an FIPB meeting on May 18, 2007.

--IANS

pk/tsb/dg

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Karti Chidambaram

First Published: Oct 04 2017 | 8:20 PM IST

Next Story