HC notice to UP govt, Ansal API for inflating prices of LIG houses

The petitioner had alleged that prices of LIG dwellings had increased to around 60%, while the original booklet mentions the rise cannot be more than 5%

HC notice to UP govt, Ansal API for inflating prices of LIG houses
Virendra Singh Rawat Lucknow
Last Updated : Jan 24 2016 | 5:25 PM IST
Allahabad High Court (HC) has issued notices to the Uttar Pradesh government and leading real estate company Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited (API) over a case of alleged arbitrarily inflating the prices of low income group (LIG) housing units in Lucknow.

A division bench, headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud, passed the order on Friday and fixed February 25 as the next date of hearing, while allowing the state government and Ansal API to file their replies in the meantime.

The HC was hearing a petition filed by Gita Devi, who had challenged the increase in prices of the LIG dwellings, while praying the same be reverted to the price levels mentioned in the original booklet of the housing scheme, when it was floated in 2013.

The petitioner’s counsel Dhruv Kumar told Business Standard the housing scheme for the LIG segment was floated by the government in October 2013 and Ansal API was authorised to build the dwelling units under two categories namely ‘Bharosa’ and ‘Aasra’ with price tags of about Rs 5.85 lakh and Rs 3.25 lakh, respectively.

However, the prices of ‘Bharosa’ and ‘Aasra’ units were arbitrarily hiked to Rs 9.51 lakh and Rs 4.04 lakh, respectively.

"The company had contended that the prices had been increased following a government order (GO) of December 5, 2013. However, we argued that this scheme had been launched prior to that and the GO applied to prospective new schemes only," he informed.

Besides, the prices could be increased by only 5% as per the scheme booklet, while the actual increases in this case had been 60% and 25%, respectively.

Kumar is confident that the writ petition could be converted into a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the court as the matter not only concerned a large number of peope, but indicated similar malpractices by other realtors across the state.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 24 2016 | 5:21 PM IST

Next Story