Industrial tribunal can decide on R K Pachauri's appeal: HC

An ex-employee filed a petition against TERI for not acting upon a sexual harassment complaint

R K Pachauri
R K Pachauri
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 06 2017 | 5:41 PM IST
The Delhi High Court on Friday "left it open" for the industrial tribunal, which is hearing former TERI chief R K Pachauri's plea against internal complaints committee's findings on him in a sexual harassment case, to proceed further and decide the appeal as per the law.

"We are, therefore, of the view that it would be appropriate to leave it open to the Industrial Tribunal-I to proceed further and decide the appeal following due process of law subject to further orders in this petition. It is open to both the parties to raise all the grounds as permissible under law before the tribunal and the same be considered and determined in accordance with the law," a bench of Chief Justice G Rohini and Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal said.

"We make it clear that the pendency of this writ petition shall not preclude the tribunal to proceed with the appeal pending on its file and to pass an appropriate order in accordance with the law on its own merit," it said.

The bench further said, "We also make it clear that the interim order dated May 17, 2016, shall continue and the final order if any passed by the Industrial Tribunal in the appeal filed by the respondent No.5 (Pachauri) shall not be given effect to except with the permission of this court."

In its 2016 interim order, the bench had said that order, if any, passed by the tribunal in the appeal shall not be given any effect.

The court's order came on a petition by a woman, a former TERI employee, who has alleged that The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) had not acted against Pachauri as per recommendations of an internal complaints committee (ICC) in connection with her sexual harassment complaint.

The high court said it is keeping the writ petition pending as vires of Rule 11 of the Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Rules 2013, is under challenge.

It said that the main petition would come up for hearing in April this year.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jan 06 2017 | 5:38 PM IST

Next Story