It might be unpatriotic, but it certainly isn't sedition: Raian Karanjawala

Interview with managing partner of legal firm Karanjawala & Co

Ranjita Ganesan
Last Updated : Mar 08 2014 | 5:28 PM IST
After a group of Kashmiri students from a private university in Meerut cheered for Pakistan in an Asia Cup match, they were charged with sedition (Section 124A of the Indian Penal Code), promoting enmity between different groups (Section 153 A) and mischief (Section 427) on March 6. Around 67 students of Kashmiri origin were suspended from the university for three days. Later, following pressure from Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and other groups, the Uttar Pradesh government decided to withdraw the sedition charge. Raian Karanjawala, managing partner of legal firm Karanjawala & Co, discusses the case, the law of sedition and its application with Ranjita Ganesan

Was the initial charge of sedition justified in this case?
In my view, the charge of sedition clearly does not apply in this case. You may be unpatriotic if you cheer for a country other than your own, but it does not make a case for sedition. The case of sedition is only made out if in the course of a speech, you incite people to violence.
 
This was a cricket match. Would it be seen as sedition had the opponent they were cheering for been Australia or England? Or is it being applied selectively here because of the context and history of dispute?
Whether it was an India-Pakistan match or an India-Australia match or a match against England, cheering for one side or another cannot bring the charge of sedition. It makes no difference who the opponent is.
 
What qualifies as sedition and typically, in which situation would one be charged with it?
As I have said earlier, if you make a speech inciting people to violence against the state, that would be a case for sedition.
 
The other charges the students face are 153 A (promoting enmity between different groups) and 427 (mischief). Are these fair in this case?  
I think at the end of the day, the state government will find it difficult to make even these charges stick against the people concerned. Frankly, it is unpatriotic to support and cheer for a country that is hostile to your own. It is seen as batting outside the crease but does not violate the law.
 
Also, do you think the expulsion of the 60 students for three days is fair punishment?  
I haven’t really got the full facts of the situation before me. My first reaction is that it is not fair.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Mar 08 2014 | 5:24 PM IST

Next Story