High Court also appointed the petitioner in his place as she was the next in the merit list in the said caste category.
The division bench of Chief Justice Virender Singh and Justice S Chandra Shekhar, while taking up a case filed by petitioner Mosrat Ziya Tata, quashed the appointment of Kumar and appointed the petitioner in his place.
Also Read
According to the petitioner, Kumar got appointed as Judicial Magistrate on the certificate of BC-1 at the time of interview while he had himself claimed to be a member of a caste under BC-2 category while applying for the post.
It was alleged that the examination controller of JPSC took him as BC-1 during interview and Kumar was benefitted because of this wrongful act of the JPSC and got appointed as the Judicial Magistrate.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)