"We are of the cogent view that undue, inordinate and unreasonable delay in the execution of death sentence does certainly attribute to torture, in violation of Article 21 and thereby entails as the ground for the commutation of the sentence," the judges said in the judgment written by Chief Justice P Sathasivam.
"Retribution has no constitutional value in our largest democratic country. In India, even an accused has a de facto protection under the Constitution and it is the court's duty to shield and protect the same," the judgment explained. It said when the court interfered in such matters, it was not stepping into the jurisdiction of the President or the governor.
Mental illness was another ground for commuting the penalty. The court reiterated its verdict that solitary confinement was illegal. It directed the family of the prisoner be informed if the mercy petition was rejected. The court said a prisoner be executed in 14 days of a clemency appeal being rejected. The judgment gave a list of 15, including one woman, whose death sentence had been turned into a life one.
They include Sresh, Ramji, Bilavendran, Simon, Gnanprakasam, Madiah, Praveen Kumar, Gurmeet Singh, Sonia, Sanjeev, Sundar Singh, Jafar Ali, Magan Lal Berala, Shivu and Jadeswamy. Among those who escaped the rope were four of the late sandalwood smuggler Veerappan's gang. They filed their mercy petitions in 2004 and nine years later their appeal was rejected.
They moved the Supreme Court for commutation. Among those likely to be benefited but not named in the judgment are three men from Tamil Nadu convicted for their roles in the assassination of former prime minister Rajiv Gandhi. Their mercy plea was filed 11 years ago by the President's office but rejected two years ago.
The mental illness gateway could help Devinderpal Singh Bhullar, convicted of triggering a bomb blast in Delhi in 1993 that killed nine. His mercy petition was rejected by the president but his family has said he was mentally ill.
Observing that while the death sentence should be passed lawfully, the execution of the sentence must also be in consonance with the constitutional mandate and not in violation of its principles, the court said. The only caveat was that the nature of delay i.e. whether it is undue or unreasonable must be appreciated based on the facts of individual cases and no exhaustive guidelines can be framed in this regard.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)