SC slams Centre for not supplying food grain to drought-hit states

Justice Ramana said acts of Parliament and directions of the (top) court are not being implemented

SC slams Centre for not supplying food grain to drought-hit states
IANS New Delhi
3 min read Last Updated : Jan 09 2020 | 4:56 PM IST
The Supreme Court on Wednesday slammed the Centre for doing nothing to comply with its directions to supply food grain to the drought-affected areas under the National Food Security Act.

The bench of Justice Madan B Lokur and Justice N V Ramana said, "We will discharge the Union of India (as respondents from the case), if it is not able to do anything."

The apex court also asked the PIL petitioner organisation, Swaraj Abhiyan, to file an affidavit flagging five or six direction that have not been complied with by the drought-hit states for initiation of contempt.

Taking a dim view of the postcard approach of the central government, Justice Lokur said, "The moment we ask you questions, it is construed as if we are attacking government of India."

As Additional Solicitor General P S Narasimha sought to play down the issue, Justice Lokur observed, "An Act of the Parliament (the National Food Security Act) is being violated with impunity, is not a small issue."

The bench said this while asking ASG Narasimha to explain what he had said in the affidavit.

Clearly exasperated over the way things were happening with states not complying with its orders and the Centre telling the court that it had sent them a communication, Justice Ramana said, "If this is the way the matter is going on, there is no need to hear it. We are wasting your time."

"An Act (the National Food Security Act) passed by the Parliament has to be followed by the states. Let them say they don't bother about the Act," Justice Lokur said, asking ASG Narasimha: "Is there a remedy under the Constitution, if states don't comply with the laws passed by the Parliament."

The strong observation from the bench came in the course of the hearing on the compliance of several directions issued by the apex court in its judgement on a PIL by Swaraj Abhiyan. The organisation had sought the court's intervention for relief to the poor people in drought-affected states, including Gujarat, Bihar and Haryana.

Gujarat, Bihar and Haryana have resisted the suggestion that they declare some of their districts as drought-affected.

Pointing to the inaction by the states and the Centre, Justice Ramana said, "We are not getting any feel or visible change except funds have been released. The mechanism has failed. The Acts of Parliament and directions of the (top) court are not being implemented."

"Is it possible to monitor the 13 odd states from here," Justice Ramana asked as ASG Narasimha urged the court to monitor the implementation of its directions.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

Topics :Supreme Court

First Published: Oct 05 2016 | 3:30 PM IST

Next Story