Bureaucratic efficiency and adequacy of returns have been identified as the major factors for the success of a PPP model of infrastructure financing, as per a study conducted by some Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) officials.
Concluding that the private sector has to complement the government's efforts in funding infrastructure development in India, the study said the flow of private investments into the sector depends on a host of factors.
"The success of such (PPP) models would require facilitating factors such as bureaucratic efficiency, adequacy of returns, efficient market mechanisms, information access, to name a few," the study noted.
The RBI staff study, titled, 'Infrastructure Financing: Global Pattern and the Indian Experience', which examined practices in infrastructure financing in some select countries, vouched for the Public Private Partnership (PPP) model.
"The PPP mode of infrastructure financing comes out as the most viable and desirable model... The model is likely to be a success, provided a transparent risk and revenue sharing approach is followed," it added.
China spends 20 per cent of its GDP on infrastructure development and this is substantially higher in comparison to India, which spends just about 6 per cent of its GDP on provision of physical infrastructure.
"Although there is a robust growth in the PPP investments in the road sector, the forthcoming investments in other sectors such as power, irrigation and ports are relatively meagre," the study highlighted.
For the 11th Plan (2007-12), the government has estimated the expenditure requirement on infrastructure at $514 billion in order to maintain the GDP growth rate of 9 per cent annually.
For the 12th Plan ending 2017, the funding need for infrastructure has been estimated at $1 trillion.
"Infrastructure financing needs cannot be met by the government alone and hence, the case for private sector participation is strong for meeting the challenge," it said.
Further, the study said banks must keep track of asset- liability mismatches arising due to infrastructure financing, adding that appraisal and monitoring mechanisms for the financed projects need to be tightened.
It also suggested finding innovative means to channelise resources of post-office deposits and pension funds into infrastructure financing and introducing land reforms for paving the way for success of these projects.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
