Centre sets up panel to probe black money

Image
BS Reporter New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 20 2013 | 2:02 AM IST

Bowing to relentless pressure from the Supreme Court for months, the central government today announced it had set up a multi-disciplinary committee with top officers to probe the issue of black money parked in foreign tax havens.

The government told a bench consisting of Justice B Sudarshan Reddy and Justice S S Nijjar the panel would be headed by the revenue secretary.

The other members will be a deputy governor of the Reserve Bank of India, director of Intelligence Bureau, director of the Central Bureau of Investigation, director of the Directorate of Enforcement, chairman of the Central Board of Direct Taxes and director general of the Narcotics Control Bureau. Moreover, secretaries of home and defence ministries and the foreign secretary would be consulted on important issues.

The court was suggesting the establishment of a special investigation team (SIT) to inquire into the generation of black money and the government was so far reluctant to do so.

Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium told the court today the government had set up a panel in line with the court suggestions.

He further assured the court the panel would go beyond the cases of Hasan Ali Khan, a Pune stud farm owner now in jail, and LTG bank, to trail money laundering.

The court was dealing with a petition moved by senior lawyer Ram Jethmalani two years ago. He had asked the court to direct the government to unearth black money kept in foreign banks.

According to Jethmalani, this is just not black money generated by tax avoidance but huge amounts of profits from illegal arms trade, smuggling narcotics and other criminal activities threatening national security.

The court was unremitting in its demand to pursue the dirty money and disclose the names of those who stashed the money abroad. Though the government has handed over a list of 26 persons, only one name, that of Khan, has been disclosed. The court has been asking the government what was the difficulty in publishing the remaining names.

The government’s argument was that it was barred from doing so because of the secrecy clause in the double taxation treaties with some European countries.

Jethmalani contended this was not simple tax evasion covered by the treaties, but fruits of international criminal activities. He said the government was reluctant to disclose the names of the persons with money tunnelled outside the country because they belong to rulers of the country.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 26 2011 | 12:48 AM IST

Next Story