CERC has also sought views from stakeholders on how to ensure fuel procurement by the generator namely e-auction coal or imported coal, at reasonable and competitive prices. Currently, generating stations face uncertainty with the supply of coal and gas and they are either forced to procure fuel from the spot market or to procure imported coal at higher prices.
Former Union power secretary R V Shahi told Business Standard: “It is already 10 years since the Electricity Act, 2003, was implemented and rate policy also completed, the terms and conditions take into account the emerging realities that both gas and coal shortages are likely to continue to be substituted through imports. Therefore, pass-through of additional cost is desirable, while keeping a balance between the interest of consumers and developers. It is necessary that lenders and developers continue to be interested in power sector especially when both these groups have shown declining interests in last three years.”
Moreover, CERC has mooted the linking return on equity (RoE) to market conditions for arriving at the rate of return. “The option of introduction of market-linked return has been thought to capture inordinate variation of risk premium over a tariff period. An after-tax RoE of 16 per cent for 2001-04 and 14 per cent for 2004-09 was specified. While framing the 2009-14 regulations, a benchmark rate of 15.5 per cent for the entire period was introduced, which was to be grossed up by applicable tax rate. Further, from December 31, 2012, RoE for storage type generating stations, including pumped storage hydro stations and run of river generating stations, with pondage was increased to 16.5 per cent,” said CERC.
It wanted to know from stakeholders whether there is a need to revisit the approach for debt: equity ratio, especially when gradual structuring of the debt market may have lead to higher reliance/availability of debt to corporate. A debt: equity ratio of 70:30 has been adopted for financing new projects commissioning after April 1, 2009, and for additional capitalisation.
Additionally, CERC has proposed an alternative approach for determination of capital cost. At present, the capital cost as on date of commissioning (COD) of new units, generating stations, or transmission system was allowed to be claimed on projected basis subject to the fact that actual COD would occur within six months from the date of filing tariff petition.
However, it was observed that projected capital cost as on COD and subsequent additional capital expenditure up to cut off date may change on account of deferment in commissioning of projects, non placement of orders due to limited vendor responses.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)