Hearing the case filed by Delhi Bullion and Jewellers Welfare Association (DBJWA), justice Vibhu Bakhru ordered defendants including Ministryof Finance, Ministry of Commerce, Directorate General of Foreign Trade andothers to file its reply with issues that prompted them to allow a handful ofstart trading houses to import gold into India.
The court also ordered respondents to present all files pertaining tothe decision making in six weeks.
The next hearing is scheduled on September23. Raising doubts over taking such decision in a hurry without addressingwider concerns - the current account deficit (CAD) - of the country, DBJWA hadfiled a writ petition in the Delhi High Court questioning the government'sintention for such decision.
DBJWA alleged that allowing a handful of startrading houses will benefit some jewellers while others will be debarred fromavailing gold.
"Unusual to the common practice, the government did not file itswritten reply in the court which the court had ordered to do by today.
Now, thecourt ordered to file its reply before September 23, the next scheduled date ofhearing," said DBJWA counsel Rahul Gupta.In order to restrict gold import to contain the CAD under control, thegovernment last year raised import duty to 10%.
Also, star tradinghouses were restricted from gold import, in addition to allow 20% ofimported gold to supply mandatorily to jewellery exporters.
But, immediately after the Bharatiya Janta party led NationalDemocratic Alliance (NDA) got majority in the Parliamentary election, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government on May 21 allowed certain startrading houses to import gold despite Narendra Modi led government was set toassume the office on May 24.
The decision was prompted with vested interest,alleged DBJWA president Vimal Kumar Goyal.
"How can the government benefit only a handful of jewellers once theentire country is facing gold supply squeeze? The government's decision wasneither in national interest nor in public at large," Goyal added.
The respondents include Union of India, the Election Commission,Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Commerce and the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) to name a few.
"Instead of taking the decision in a hurry, the government should havewaited for a few days," said the writ petition.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)