Don't disclose predecessor's letter to Prez: CEC

Image
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 1:47 AM IST

Chief Election Commissioner Navin Chawla has refused to give consent for disclosure of the controversial letter by his predecessor N Gopalaswami to the President recommending his removal.

RTI activist S C Agrawal had sought the copy of the letter from the President's Secretariat, which refused to disclose the matter, prompting him to reach the Central Information Commission with his plea.

The CIC in its November 9 order had directed the President's Secretariat to seek the consent of Chawla before disclosing it to Agrawal.

"In pursuance to the directions of the CIC, the matter was taken up with third party Navin Chawla, Chief Election Commissioner. The Chief Election Commissioner is of the considered view that the letter/report sent by N Gopalaswami to the President may not be disclosed to the applicant under the RTI Act," the Central Public Information Officer of the secretariat informed Agrawal.

In its reply, the CPIO said taking into consideration the relevant material, views expressed by Navin Chawla and the statutory requirement under RTI Act, the information "does not merit disclosure."

"No copy of objections from Navin Chawla has been provided to me which may make clear about exemption-clause(s) referred (and accepted by the CPIO at President's secretariat) for not disclosing information/documents as sought in my RTI petition," Agrawal said in his new appeal against the reply.

President's Secretariat had refused to give copy of the letter which had hogged limelight as it was alleged that Gopalaswami had recommended to the President Chawla's removal from office for alleged "partisan" functioning.

Agrawal had sought the copy of Gopalaswami's letter, which was rejected by the President's Secretariat saying its disclosure would be an invasion of privacy. It had invoked the related Clause Section 8 (1) (e) of the RTI to deny the same.

Agrawal had argued that contents of the letter were already in the media and hence there was no reason to claim "invasion of privacy".

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Feb 02 2010 | 4:11 PM IST

Next Story