FIPB asks revenue dept to restrict FDI scrutiny

Image
Anindita Dey Mumbai
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 2:33 AM IST

The Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) has advised the Department of Revenue to restrict its scrutiny of foreign investment proposals.

Official sources close to the development said that the Department of Revenue, under the Ministry of Finance, has started scrutinising all proposals even when it is not required or directed so. According to the FIPB rules, a proposal is vetted only by the original ministry and then any related ministry if it is recommended by the board.

However, of late, the revenue department has been examining all proposals, which are delaying fresh foreign investment proposals, otherwise known as foreign collaboration proposals. Some proposals are pending even for months together, officials have said.

Revenue officials are of the view that each proposal has to be examined to see if the proposal is genuine foreign investment or a mere transaction by an Indian company to roundtrip money, otherwise known as money laundering. This requires a thorough examination of source of funds, end use, credentials of the investors and business track record overseas, among others.

Moreover, such proposals, after getting approved are entitled for tax treatment either in accordance with the existing law in India or double taxation treaties. Thus, they also have a revenue angle. “If a foreign investment proposal gets approved and gets a favourable tax treatment according to a treaty but the investors are routing their money from foreign origin to into India through a fake project, it not only hampers foreign investment but hampers revenue as well,” said a tax official.

However, sources said if there is a delay beyond a stipulated time for clearing the proposal because of time taken by the Department of Revenue, even when their comments are not required, such proposals get cleared “in principle”.

Now, there has been a lot of delay in approval of foreign collaboration proposals for various reasons, one of them being a closer scrutiny of the Department of Revenue, sources said.

Officials have also added that if there are sensitive issues, the board itself directs ministries concerned to take a decision or even propose to cancel the approval, even when the project has got the approval.

Explaining the case, officials said due to security reasons, the proposals of foreign companies like ByCell and Telcordia were reviewed even when they had received the approval and started the operations.

However, close scrutiny even in cases when it is not required creates undue delay in granting approvals.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Apr 13 2010 | 12:45 AM IST

Next Story