Government drops proposal to restrict mineral exploration

More than one entity to be encouraged, officials discuss amendments to MMDR Act

Narendra Singh Tomar
Jyoti MukulDeepak Patel New Delhi
Last Updated : Dec 25 2014 | 1:01 AM IST
The ministry of mines has dropped a proposal to restrict initial search for mineralisation done under reconnaissance permits. The ministry is finalising amendments to the mining law.

Officials said the ministry had circulated a Cabinet note on amendments to the Mines and Minerals (Development And Regulation) Act. Prior to seeking Cabinet approval, Mines and Steel Minister Narendra Singh Tomar convened a meeting of senior officials from the ministries of law, atomic energy, finance, coal and mines. Their comments are expected to be finalised by December 29.

In an earlier draft amendment put up for discussion, it was proposed private companies not be given reconnaissance permits needed to identify areas of enhanced mineral potential through remote sensing, aerial reconnaissance and ground sampling.

Following discussions, officials said the ministry had decided on an open policy for reconnaissance permits, allowing more than one player in an area. Besides, existing holders of permits will have the right to obtain prospecting licences or mining leases.

In the new amendment draft order, yet to be cleared by Cabinet, the government has classified minerals into two categories, notified and non-notified. Bulk minerals like iron, limestone, manganese and bauxite, which account for 85 per cent of India's mineral production, have been categorised as notified minerals. All other minerals are to be considered non-notified.

According to industry experts, the government does not have the wherewithal for large-scale reconnaissance. The Federation of Indian Mineral Industries (FIMI) said, "To assume that there is enough knowledge up to the prospecting level for notified minerals at the level of state governments or the Geological Survey of India (GSI) shows how far from reality is the central government."

The FIMI also argued the assumption that some minerals were surficial was erroneous. There are a number of underground manganese and chrome mines in Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra and Odisha. Even for iron or bauxite, there was no such thing as surficial, many iron mines in Goa had gone below sea level, it said. "To auction on the basis of limited knowledge available with state governments or the GSI is to botch the whole scheme," it added.


*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 25 2014 | 12:42 AM IST

Next Story