Faced with stiff opposition from the BJP and the Left, the government today dropped plans to dilute a key provision in the Nuclear Liability Bill, as its top officials were grilled by the Parliamentary Committee.
Department of Atomic Energy Secretary Srikumar Banerjee, Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao and a number of other senior officials faced tough questions during the meeting of the parliamentary standing committee on science and technology on aspects like liability of the supplier of a nuclear plant or material and cap of Rs 500 crore on compensation.
Banerjee expressed regrets before the committee for circulating a note at the last meeting which contained a proposal for amending clause 17 (b).
The clause proposes that the operator would have legal recourse if a nuclear accident results from the “wilful act or gross negligence on the part of the supplier of the material, equipment or services, or of his employee.”
According to the note circulated in the last meeting of the Standing Committee on June 8, clause 17 (b) had been deleted, while clause 17 (a) and (c) had been retained.
At the meeting today, the committee was informed that the government was withdrawing that note and the original clause remains, sources said.
Clause 17 (a) provides that the operator could have legal recourse if “such right is expressly provided in the contract in writing” while 17 (c) says recourse could be taken if “the nuclear incident has resulted from the act of commission or omission of a person done with the intent to cause nuclear damage.”
The decision to drop the amendment assumes significance as it coincides with the uproar over handling of the Bhopal gas tragedy in which the then government is accused of allowing the operators of Union Carbide to go scot-free.
During the day-long meeting, members of the committee grilled Banerjee and other officials, questioning the intent behind the amendments and wondered whether the consent of the Cabinet had been taken for it, sources said.
The government officials are understood to have told the committee that the amendments were only “suggestions”.
After the proposals were moved at the last committee meeting, the government had come under sharp attack from the BJP and the Left, which questioned whether it was being done to help American companies.
Another area of contention was the Rs 500-crore cap on the compensation to be paid by an operator of a nuclear power plant in case of an accident.
There were strong demands that the cap be raised.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
