HC reserves order on Rishikesh housing project

Image
Shishir Prashant New Delhi/ Dehra Dun
Last Updated : Jan 21 2013 | 6:57 AM IST

The Uttarakhand High Court today reserved its judgement in the controversial Rishikesh-based housing project case after the state government admitted that it was kept in the dark and thus withdrew all the incentives given to Citurgia Biochemical, a Mumbai-based company.

A division bench of the High Court comprising Justice Barin Ghosh and Justice V K Bist reserved the judgement after hearing the arguments from the government, Citurgia, petitioners and others.

During the arguments, Citurgia’s counsel pleaded before the court that the company wanted to revive the factory. But the Court rejected the plea on environmental grounds.

Last week, the government had withdrawn all the incentives given to Citurgia saying it was kept in the dark by the company in the matter related to revival scheme.

During the hearing yesterday, the court sought various details regarding the permission for land-use change. The court also heard the arguments of the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) in the matter.

During the arguments, the NGOs told the court that the government had set a wrong precedent by changing the land use pattern of the industry to facilitate a housing project in Rishikesh near river Ganga, which is in gross violation of the environmental norms and thus they sought CBI probe in the matter.

The government had so far maintained that it only followed the advice of the BIFR on the matter. The government last year accorded permission to Mumbai-based Citurgia Biochemical limited, which was producing chemical carbonate at its Rishikesh plant, to sell big chunk of its land to a private developer for constructing a housing project. A lockout was declared in the Citurgia factory in 2003 after it became sick and the matter was referred to the BIFR.

Though the government claimed that the permission for the housing project was accorded under a BIFR revival scheme, the opposition parties and NGOs had cast aspersions saying there is no permission for constructing a housing project along the river on environmental grounds.

The Citurgia company has so far maintained that it sold a part of the factory’s land to raise funds as part of the BIFR revival scheme.

*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Dec 01 2010 | 1:01 AM IST

Next Story