In a report after an IAEA team recently visited India to review the country’s regulatory framework for nuclear safety, the agency recommended that the AERB review the implementation of its policies and existing arrangements to ensure its independence as a regulator.
The Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority Bill, 2011, is awaiting being reintroduced in Parliament after the version prepared by the former United Progressive Alliance government lapsed. The bill had proposed dissolution of the AERB and its replacement with the Nuclear Safety Regulatory Authority (NSRA).
“The IAEA report acknowledges that the AERB has functional independence as a regulator. The IAEA did not find any instances where de facto independence was compromised and it has suggested legal status be accorded to the AERB. As far as the bill to establish the NSRA is concerned, it is expected to come up in Parliament,” AERB secretary Hari Kumar told Business Standard.
The IAEA further noted that because the governance framework for atomic energy had both the industry and the regulator reporting to the Atomic Energy Commission, there was no clear separation of regulation.
“The regulatory body should be constituted through a legislative process, thus demonstrating clear legal independence from the industry. In order to ensure the independence of the regulatory body is clear and transparent the government should strengthen the legislative framework by creating in law the AERB as a regulatory body separated from entities having responsibilities or interests that could unduly influence its decision making,” the IAEA said in its report.
The IAEA said the regulator should perform its functions in a manner that did not compromise its effective independence. The staff of the regulatory body shall remain focused on performing their functions in relation to safety, irrespective of any personal views. The competence of staff is a necessary element in achieving effective independence in decision making by the regulatory body.
According to the IAEA, the regulatory body should ensure that in its liaison with interested parties it has a clear separation from organisations or bodies that have been assigned responsibilities for facilities or activities or for their promotion.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
)