| Officials said the re-worked double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA) is likely to become operational from the next fiscal. | |
| "The Japanese authorities have agreed to a 50 per cent reduction in the tax rate. But the final rate will be decided later," the officials said. | |
| The move will benefit Indian IT industry as the national tax authority of Japan has been treating off-shore work by the Indian companies as "fees for technical services", and taxing such work at 20 per cent on gross basis. | |
| The move will benefit companies like Infosys, Wipro, TCS and HCL which are tapping the Japanese market. India's IT and IT-enabled services exports to Japan are estimated to exceed $450 million in the financial year 2004-05. In 2003-04 the exports had grown by 43.2 per cent to $385.4 million. | |
| The issue assumes importance as the off-shore services are being taxed at 20 per cent on gross billing, whereas for on-site services the tax is on profits (gross billing less costs), which works out lower. | |
| India has lowered the rate for "fees for technical services" in the recent budget to 10 per cent. This has benefitted the Japanese companies as industry experts indicate there is a substantial import of technical know-how from Japan. | |
| According to tax experts, the Japanese interpretation of the tax treaty is not in line with international norms, as software and IT-enabled services are generally not taxed as "fees for technical service". | |
| Further, DTAA, which is a tax avoidance agreement, cannot be used to levy a tax, the experts say. All these factors have led to an agreement on reducing the tax rates. | |
| The Indian authorities had taken the position that off-shore services should not be taxed, while part of them relating to management and co-ordination services could be included as part of on-site work and taxed accordingly. | |
| The issue relating to interpretation of DTAA came up about three years ago when the Indian industry raised concerns that the Japanese were interpreting the agreement in their favour. This was because the DTAA overrode the Japanese domestic law which did not tax off-shore services.
| |
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
