ITAT refuses to stay tax demand on former owner of Raw Pressery brand

Rs 123 crore of tax demanded on shares sold for huge premium to actress Jacqueline Fernandes, Mauritius-based entities

tax
Against a loss shown by the company, the assessing officer imposed a tax at Rs 115.56 crore which now comes at Rs 123 crore with interest.
Indivjal Dhasmana New Delhi
2 min read Last Updated : Feb 18 2022 | 12:37 AM IST
An income tax appellate panel has refused to grant a stay on Rs 123 crore of taxes demanded by the authorities on share transfer by a fruit juice start-up to Mauritius based entities and actress Jacqueline Fernandes for huge premiums.

The case relates to the start-up, Raykan Beverages, that used to sell fruit juices under the brand of "Raw Pressery". While the company's loses increased day by day from Rs 25.72 crore to Rs 48.01 crore during the financial years 2016-17 and 2017-18, it issued shares to those cited above among others at a huge premium ranging from Rs 2,401.41 to Rs 2,786.26 of face value of Rs 100 each.

Against this backdrop, the assessing officer probed the taxability of share premium. Under the income tax Act provisions
a company, where public interest is not substantial, has to pay tax if it sells shares at a premium in excess of fair market value.

It appears that even in the succeeding years, the company continued to make huge losses, and was eventually sold for a mere Rs 100 crores to Wingreens Farms.

Against a loss shown by the company, the assessing officer imposed a tax at Rs 115.56 crore which now comes at Rs 123 crore with interest.  The company has already lost the case at the commissioner of income tax (appeal) level.

As such, it filed appeal before the income tax appellate tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai both for quashing the demand as well as stay on it till order. While ITAT refrained from going to the merit of the overall case, it ordered that it is not a fit case for grant of a stay.

It said on the face of it, the computation of share premium is devoid of any basis.

It said the company has the liberty to make detailed arguments, and also to bring to the tribunal's notice any material demolishing these prima facie observations.

Amit Maheshwari, tax partner at AKM, said issuing shares at a premium is not new. "However, the basis for the calculation of premium over the face value of such shares should be based on reasonable and realistic parameters."

He said valuation is very subjective, especially in the case of start ups. 

One subscription. Two world-class reads.

Already subscribed? Log in

Subscribe to read the full story →
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

Topics :Income Tax Appellate TribunalTaxation LawsRAW Pressery

Next Story