Ketan Parekh entities want probe deferred

Image
Ashish Aggarwal New Delhi
Last Updated : Feb 06 2013 | 5:15 PM IST
Ketan Parekh entities today did not have an answer to the Company Law Board (CLB) query on the legal basis for asking for postponement of investigations.

The judge further added that if Parekh's entities wanted a review of its order they should go to the High Court.

CLB was hearing the counsels to decide on a temporary stay it had given to investigations by the Serious Frauds Investigation Office (SFIO) into 16 entities belonging to Ketan Parekh.

The order had indicted the entities owned and controlled by Ketan Parekh including V N Parekh Securities, KNP Securities Ltd and Classic Credit Ltd, for 'defrauding' creditors and other stakeholders in the stock market scam.

When the judge asked the defence counsel to point out any provision of law or a precedent whereby the execution of final order could be deferred, the counsel did not quote any such provision. On the other hand, the government counsel argued that under regulation 152 of the Criminal Procedure Code only one month delay could be granted.

The lawyer defending Ketan Parekh entities argued before the CLB that investigation by the SFIO should be postponed.

At the hearing the defence counsel argued that if the CLB ordered investigation by the SFIO it would lead to 'extortion and harassment' through a 'roving and fishing exercise' by the inspectors as all the books had already been seized by various regulatory agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), Income Tax department and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi).

Arguing against any deferment, the government counsel rebutted the defence plea saying that there was no legal provision based on which CLB could defer investigations beyond one month.

And more than one month had already elapsed, the government counsel added in the course of hearing.

The government counsel pointed out that any delay would harm the investigations as evidence could be destroyed.

Further, as the defence had only asked for deferment there was no basis for arguing the merits of the case at this stage, the government counsel added.

The judge is expected to announce his final order in a day or two. The government had earlier forwarded a team of four inspectors to SFIO for assisting in its investigations.

But before investigations could start the petition for postponement was filed.

Seeking a review
  • The judge added that if Parekh's entities wanted a review of its order they should go to the High Court
  • The order has indicted all the 16 entities owned and controlled by Ketan Parekh
  • The judge is expected to announce his final order in a day or two


*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Nov 25 2004 | 12:00 AM IST

Next Story