The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) today directed Bharti Airtel to deposit 25% of Rs 50 crore fine imposed by DoT for camouflaging the calling-line identification (CLI) and said that "prima facie" the company has violated the licence conditions.
"We, therefore, are of the opinion that prima-facie the petitioner [Bharti Airtel] has violated the conditions of licence," said the TDSAT in its interim order.
The sectoral tribunal further noted that Bharti Airtel should not have handed over the incorrect call data records and given misinformation to the Telecom Enforcement Resources & Monitoring Cell (TERM).
"Keeping in view the fact that an allegation of violation of conditions of licence of such nature had been made, the petitioner not only should have handed over the correct CDR but should not also have given wrong information to the respondent that the Mediation Server is located at Noida," the tribunal said.
Moreover, it said when TERM had called a meeting with Bharti Airtel, the company officers did not attend it. They did not even give an advance intimation about their non- participation in the meeting, the tribunal added.
"It was necessary keeping in view the request made by the respondent to attend the said meeting with the petitioner's COO/ CEO and technical team," TDSAT said.
The Department of Telecommunications (DoT) had slapped a penalty of Rs 50 crore on Bharti Airtel for allegedly camouflaging its CLI mechanism in Madhya Pradesh circle for making business promotion calls to non-Airtel mobile customers. The company had challenged the fine in the tribunal.
The TDSAT also rejected the claims of the Bharti Airtel that it was not given a chance to present its views and no show cause notice was issued by DoT.
"The petitioner, as would appear from the TERM letter dated January 21, 2011 and the consequent cause shown by the petitioner by its letter dated Janury 27, 2011, was also granted an opportunity of being heard and making a presentation," observed TDSAT.
"We are furthermore of the opinion that the Airtel has been given an opportunity to explain its case," it further observed.
The tribunal, however, also said DoT also failed to justify why a maximum penalty of Rs 50 crore was imposed on the telecom operator for making business promotion calls to non-Airtel mobile customers.
"There is nothing on record to show as to why the maximum amount of penalty of Rs 50 crore has been imposed, and furthermore having regard to the nature of defence raised by the petitioners that the violation occurred owing to a technical error, are of the opinion that interest of justice would be sub-served, if the petitioner is directed to deposit 25% of the said amount, namely, a sum of Rs 12.50 crore," the tribunal said.
You’ve reached your limit of {{free_limit}} free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Exclusive premium stories online
Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app
